User Tools

Site Tools


glossary

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
glossary [2019/03/07 14:43]
dave.wright@ucl.ac.uk Update global/local sensitivity after suggestion by Daan
glossary [2019/03/15 09:33]
dave.wright@ucl.ac.uk
Line 11: Line 11:
 ====== VECMA Specific Terms ====== ====== VECMA Specific Terms ======
  
-**Patterns** within VECMA are abstractions that describe, in a non-application specific manner, a workflow or algorithm for conducting validation, verification,​ uncertainty quantification or sensitivity analysis.+**Patterns** within VECMA are abstractions that describe, in a non-application ​and non-domain ​specific manner, a workflow or algorithm for conducting validation, verification,​ uncertainty quantification or sensitivity analysis
 +The set of patterns described in the proposal is detailed [[proposal_patterns|here]].
  
 **Uncertainty Quantification Pattern (UQP)** is the term for workflows and algorithms focussed on uncertainty quantification and propagation or sensitivity analysis. **Uncertainty Quantification Pattern (UQP)** is the term for workflows and algorithms focussed on uncertainty quantification and propagation or sensitivity analysis.
Line 77: Line 78:
  
 ====== References ====== ====== References ======
 +
 +B. Chopard, J. Borgdorff and A. G. Hoekstra. “A framework for multi-scale modelling.”,​ Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical,​ Physical and Engineering Sciences, 372 (2014), doi: 10.1098/​rsta.2013.0378
  
 A. Der Kiureghian and O. Ditlevsen, "​Aleatory or epistemic? Does it matter?​."​ Structural Safety 31.2 (2009): 105-112, https://​doi.org/​10.1016/​j.strusafe.2008.06.020 A. Der Kiureghian and O. Ditlevsen, "​Aleatory or epistemic? Does it matter?​."​ Structural Safety 31.2 (2009): 105-112, https://​doi.org/​10.1016/​j.strusafe.2008.06.020
Line 85: Line 88:
  
 R. H. Johnstone, //et al.//, "​Uncertainty and variability in models of the cardiac action potential: Can we build trustworthy models?​."​ Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology 96 (2016): 49-62, https://​doi.org/​10.1016/​j.yjmcc.2015.11.018 R. H. Johnstone, //et al.//, "​Uncertainty and variability in models of the cardiac action potential: Can we build trustworthy models?​."​ Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology 96 (2016): 49-62, https://​doi.org/​10.1016/​j.yjmcc.2015.11.018
- 
  
 J. B. Nagel, "​Bayesian techniques for inverse uncertainty quantification"​. Diss. ETH Zurich, (2017), https://​doi.org/​10.3929/​ethz-a-010835772 J. B. Nagel, "​Bayesian techniques for inverse uncertainty quantification"​. Diss. ETH Zurich, (2017), https://​doi.org/​10.3929/​ethz-a-010835772
Line 97: Line 99:
 N. E. Owen, //et al.//, "​Comparison of surrogate-based uncertainty quantification methods for computationally expensive simulators."​ SIAM/ASA Journal on Uncertainty Quantification 5.1 (2017): 403-435, https://​epubs.siam.org/​doi/​10.1137/​15M1046812 N. E. Owen, //et al.//, "​Comparison of surrogate-based uncertainty quantification methods for computationally expensive simulators."​ SIAM/ASA Journal on Uncertainty Quantification 5.1 (2017): 403-435, https://​epubs.siam.org/​doi/​10.1137/​15M1046812
  
 +Rothschild, Michael, and Joseph E. Stiglitz. "​Increasing risk: I. A definition."​ Journal of Economic theory 2.3 (1970): 225-243. https://​doi.org/​10.1016/​0022-0531(70)90038-4
 +
 +Saltelli, Andrea, et al. "​Variance based sensitivity analysis of model output. Design and estimator for the total sensitivity index."​ Computer Physics Communications 181.2 (2010): 259-270. https://​doi.org/​10.1016/​j.cpc.2009.09.018
 +
 +Saltelli, Andrea, and Paola Annoni. "How to avoid a perfunctory sensitivity analysis."​ Environmental Modelling & Software 25.12 (2010): 1508-1517. https://​doi.org/​10.1016/​j.envsoft.2010.04.012
 +
 +Sobol, Ilya M. "​Global sensitivity indices for nonlinear mathematical models and their Monte Carlo estimates."​ Mathematics and computers in simulation 55.1-3 (2001): 271-280. https://​doi.org/​10.1016/​S0378-4754(00)00270-6
 +
 +Soize, Christian. Uncertainty Quantification. Springer International Publishing AG, 2017. https://​link.springer.com/​book/​10.1007/​978-3-319-54339-0
 +
 +van den Bos, L. M. M., Barry Koren, and Richard P. Dwight. "​Non-intrusive uncertainty quantification using reduced cubature rules."​ Journal of Computational Physics 332 (2017): 418-445. https://​doi.org/​10.1016/​j.jcp.2016.12.011
 +
 +Wu, Xu, and Tomasz Kozlowski. "​Inverse uncertainty quantification of reactor simulations under the Bayesian framework using surrogate models constructed by polynomial chaos expansion."​ Nuclear Engineering and Design 313 (2017): 29-52. https://​doi.org/​10.1016/​j.nucengdes.2016.11.032
  
glossary.txt · Last modified: 2019/04/03 10:26 by dave.wright@ucl.ac.uk